Zeiss conquest hd 8x32 vs swarovski cl 8x30. The 10x40 has the same size, weight, and price as the 8x40.

Zeiss conquest hd 8x32 vs swarovski cl 8x30 The SV 8X32 is pretty sharp from edge to edge. Paultricounty Well-known member. 3rd: Swaro Companion CL-II 8X30 - Excellent optically but the new diopter design is a no go for me. It is smaller more compact and with the big difference being better contrast and sharper edges than either the Zeiss or Kowa. I would like to know how far the differences are with these two Swarovskis. I'm going to fall on my sword here after owning 30+ binoculars in the 300-1500 range, I'm ready to finally declare the 8x32 Zeiss Conquest HD my winner. 1 = 124 Apparent Field of View AFOV (spec. 6. Unlike the daylight performance mentioned above, as twilight set in, the Zeiss 40s pulled ahead of the Zeiss 30s. where available, otherwise measured and rounded) Zeiss Victory SF 8x32 67 Swarovski NL Pure 65 Zeiss Conquest HD 64 Zeiss SFL 63 Blaser Globetrotter 62. Zeiss’s Conquest HD 8x32 for example sits below this price level at around £590. Swaro Companion. Either one is going to outclass the baby Nikon. 4 weeks tropical birding with the I think a good 8x32 is the best all around size for birding and the Trinovid 8x32 is a pretty good choice, although it has a smallish FOV and somewhat soft edges. I would seriously look at the Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 or if you want something smaller try the 8x30's like the CL. Binocular advice - tempted by the Zeiss. I wish there could be a 8x30/32 with 55-57 deg AFOV to gain eye relief. They are very close. E_S; Feb 2, 2022 UVHD+ 8x32 / CHD 8x32 / EL 8x32 UV's edge is around 74%, CHD aroung 83% and EL over 99% I find that to be true with some Zeiss and Swarovski. After 20 great years using Swaro 8x32 In 2022, Zeiss released their SFL (SmartFocus Lightweight) binocular line with 8x40 and 10x40 models. Zeiss has changed my mind with their new Zeiss SFL 8×30 binoculars. My dad has an XS FHF harness but that was a 1 time production run. 1. Cl Companion 8x30 vs. Zeiss SFL8x30 vs Swarovski CL Companion 8x30. SFL 8x30. SFL 10x30. Reactions: Viraj. I got a used Euro HD 8x32 for under $500 on eBay and it’s an absolutely fabulous little binocular. Reactions: ReinierB. I have started a new thread because I have added a third to the mix because of limitations/ ergonomics (for me) of Conquest HD 8x42 and the Swarovski SLC 8x42 Compare ZEISS 8x40 SFL Binoculars vs ZEISS 8x30 SFL Binoculars vs Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular Anthracite, Urban Jungle Accessories Package vs ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HDX Binoculars Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Compare ZEISS Conquest HD vs Nikon Monarch HG vs Swarovski CL Companion ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HD Binoculars (29) View Cart. It does have a slightly Conquest HD 10x42 Conquest HD 8x32 Swaro 10x25 CL P Swaro 8x25 CL P Alpen Wings HD 10x42 And the view through the CL is so great they are better than many 8x30's. ZDHart Well-known member. In the accompanying photograph of this test’s contenders, the more eagle-eyed may notice that the Conquest looks a little second-hand. 3 EL is declared 8. Thanks in advance --- Reply. The Conquest HD has a slightly bigger FOV but the Swarovski has slightly sharper edges. Free Standard Shipping Compare ZEISS 8x40 SFL Binoculars vs ZEISS 8x30 SFL Binoculars vs Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular Anthracite, Urban Jungle Accessories Package vs ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HDX Binoculars Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Compare Swarovski CL Companion vs ZEISS Conquest HD Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular (Green, Urban Jungle Accessories Package) You Pay: $1,449. It is available in 10x32 and 8x32. Both of those conquests hang with my swaro. Replies 97 Views 30K. Your needs and experience may differ. 5 mm Comparison 1: Zeiss SFL 8x30 and Leica UV 8x32 HD+ Zeiss SFL8x30 vs Swarovski CL Companion 8x30. Vortex Razor UHD 8x32 and 10x32 - first impressions. One of the best sizes / feel of an 8x32 I’ve used. Thread starter Newtosavage; Start date Dec 8, 2018; Prev. I switched to ZEISS because the Swarovski doesn’t take a bino stud. I did have the Zeiss 8x25 but liked the Swaro's better. Nikon 8x30 Monarch HG Binoculars . BogBean Well-known member. 7 = 135 Swarovski CL Companion 7. Zeiss Conquest HD vs Swarovski Companion CL — Review Compact 30-32mm Binoculars Hands-on comparison . I A/B tested Conquest HD 8x32 and 10x32 models before buying. 0 Overall score: 9. W Comparing ZEISS Conquest HD vs Swarovski CL Companion . Continuing on with BBR’s mini “BinoWars” series in which I pit different instruments and different configurations against each Compare ZEISS Conquest HD vs Swarovski CL Companion vs Leica Trinovid HD. SFL 8x40. The Zeiss Conquest HD is one. Leave the other options alone (you can mention it). In contrast here’s the same Ultravid 8x32 next to the Ultravid 8x20, which is a true “compact”: If you decide to go for “larger / more comfortable” and are willing to spend Zeiss VP money since this will be a long term investment, also consider the Monarch HG 8x30 and the Swarovski CL 8x30. CL Companion 8x30 I would look at the conquest 8x32 vs the swaroski 8x30 if I were you, as the price point is more similar and both work fine with glasses . Although the price of the Zeiss Conquest HD is about half that of the most expensive binoculars in our survey, the resolution score was just as high. I am glad it is size and weight-wise more like the Nikon. the Zeiss SF 8x32 and 10x32 and Swarovski NL 8x32 and 10x32, it just comes down to personal preference which you prefer. Jul 5, 2024 Swarovski CL Companion 8x30 VS Swarovski EL 8x32 - posted in Binoculars: Gang,Im in the process of getting a pair of binoculars for travelling. Sinnbad. Apr 2, 2023 #162 lmans66 said: What is the length of the NL 8x32 compared to the I've had the Trinovid HD 8x32 for about a year and recently acquired Swaro Companion CL 8x30 (first gen). Price of the new Conquest is similar to used Leica or Swarovski. 00 (10) Add to Cart View Cart. That is pretty impressive for a smaller 30mm binocular. For spec wearers I think the SVs are probably the best with 20mm eye relief and large eye lenses, but I I had previously started a thread: Conquest HD 8x42 vs Swarovski SLC 8x42. How do you think about the new Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 in comparison with the Carl Zeiss Jena 8x30 (DDR) and BPO 7x30 (USSR binoculars)? Thanks. Nice big FOV and very bright and a good value for the money. The bigger glass are only a few ounces heavier. × ZEISS Swarovski 8x32 EL Field Pro vs Zeiss Victory T* FL 8x32 Thread starter it lags behind some other I have, namely a Meopta/Cabelas Euro HD 8X32 and a Conquest HD 8X32. There is a huge difference between the NL 8x32 and the CL 8x30 in FOV and ease of eye placement. 30 years guaranteed after sales service. The NL has a much bigger FOV and has considerably easier eye placement because of the bigger exit pupil. Of course the 8x30 CL is more compact and lighter in the hand. The differences are of course the Although this review focused on the 32mm, the Zeiss Conquest HDs also come in 42mm models. However, for me the main criteria for preselection where size and weight, so the Ultravid seemed to be the better competitor to the CL. With regards to specs, they seem almost the same, There is a guy on Cloudy Nights that wrote a review comparing it to the Swarovski 8x25 CL-P and he liked the Terra better saying it was sharper and all the reviews on it are 5 star. Its nearest competitor It is a bit of a different package than the x32 Zeiss and Kowa which may or may not appeal to you, and offers reasonably good optics. Compare ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HD Binoculars vs Swarovski 10x30 CL Companion Binocular Anthracite, Wild Nature Accessories Package vs ZEISS 10x30 SFL Binoculars vs ZEISS 8x30 SFL Binoculars Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers The Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 beats the Nikon EII as far as our light transmission measurements is concerned. but I ended up with the maven b3 8x30. Compare Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular Green vs ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HD Binoculars vs Swarovski 8x42 SLC Binoculars vs Leica 8x42 Trinovid HD Binoculars Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 at 850 euro new Swarovski CL Companion 8x30 at 1000 euro or I should stick to the initial Zeiss Conquest HD 8x42 which is 1100 euro ? Swarovski 8. Will get a chance to look through them both in the next few weeks but in the mean time anyone who has Better to compare the Conquest HD, which is a much better binocular than the one you are asking about, and therefore can be compared in some ways to the EL. Ease of use, which was a bit of a bother at first, is now right up there with a 'regular' binocular. Brief review of Meopta Meostar B1 HD 10x42 with comparison Swarovski Pure 8x32 : Leica Ultravid HD-Plus 8x32: Close Focus: 4. Zeiss Conquest 8x32 HD vs Zeiss Conquest 8x30 BT* I am looking at buying the older model, but before I do i would like to know what I'll be giving up --- If much. 7 degree FOV and the Zeiss Conquest HD is very sharp on-axis. The Conquest HD 8x32 has a slightly larger FOV but the CL has sharper edges. Wow. The 8x32 Zeiss Zeiss SFL8x30 vs Swarovski CL Companion 8x30 Thread starter FlowChi; Start date Mar 23 I need to purchase the Zeiss VP 25, SFL 30, and Swarovski CL so that I can compare with my Yes, I think the Conquest HD 8x32 were a more rounded-superior package, but they're also heavier and bulkier, which kind of puts them in another Comparison 2: Zeiss SFL 8x30 and Swarovski CL 8x30 Comparison 3: Zeiss SFL 8x30 and Nikon MHG 8x30 Comparison 6: Zeiss SFL 8x30 and Conquest 8x32 HD Comparison "7 and 8": Zeiss SFL 8x30 and Mount Olympus . The eye relief isn’t quite what I like. fast forward to this year I compared my Trinovid HD 8x32 to another acquired 1st gen Swaro CL 8x30 Besides, I must have longish eyelashes, because with narrow eyecups I also have the problem of my eyelashes touching the rubber rime of the eyecup, which can be really annoying. similar to the systems used by Zeiss and Swarovski, hard plastic body armor. dorubird; Sep I have recently tried the following 8x32s; Swarovski EL & SV, Zeiss Victory and Conquest HD, but was not able to compare them all at the same time. The CL has sharper edges and better contrast. Z. I have seen these binoculars and think they are really nice ergonomically, but they have a limited field of view, and show noticeable levels of pincushion distortion and chromatic It is about the same weight as the HD, but it has a 6. MHG or the new SFL. Swarovski CL B 8x30 vs Kowa Genesis 8x33 vs NL Pure 10x42. Four that I have on hand at the moment; Leica 7x42 UVHD+, Swarovski CL 8x30 (2018 release), Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32, and Maven B3 8x30. D. The Conquest is beloved by many and has good eye relief for an 8x32. Zeiss Conquest HD: 24 mm Zeiss SFL: 23 mm Nikon Monarch HG 22. Both are very worthy considerations. 1 8x32, the long in service benchmark Zeiss 8x32 FL and the most recent Leica Ultravid HD+. Perfect size and weight. including my Conquest HD 8x32. The Zeiss 8x32 FL or Swarovski 8x32 SV would be a good Battle of the small binos-Zeiss conquest hd 8x32 vs victory pocket 8x25 vs maven b3 8x30 especially from the birdwatching guys, the conquest and maven lead the pack in the 8x30 platform for this price range (near-alpha, I’ll call it). ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HD Binoculars (29) View Cart. M. The Meopta has a newer version out, the B1 Plus with different armour and according to Meopta improved optical and mechanical tolerances Swarovski CL Companion 8x30 B NOMAD. Even the Kern Piza 8x30 porro is brighter than the Nikon EII and using an USAF 1951 chart we measuured a better resolution for the Kern Pizar 8x30 and the Swarovski 8x32 SV. Here is a mini-review I wrote on a comparison of the Swarovski 8x30 CL compared to a well known excellent mid-priced 32mm the Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32. cycleguy Well-known member. Or even buy a used ( no longer made) 8x30 Swaro SLC- because IMO, it is optically better than the 8x30 CL that replaced Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 Optical resolution score: 10. Zeiss SF 8x30 vs SFL 8x40. If you had an SF 8x42 and a Conquest HD 8x32, you could replace them both with the SFL 8x40 and save a lot of money. Swarovski 8x32 EL Field Pro vs Zeiss Victory T* FL 8x32 Thread starter it lags behind some other I have, namely a Meopta/Cabelas Euro HD 8X32 and a Conquest HD 8X32. At almost 2x the price of the Conquest HD, I am sure the SFL will have better glass and coatings than the Conquest, and those are the things that start elevating a binocular into the alpha category and will give it that alpha "pop". The Maven B. Due to supply limitations, Zeiss was only able to send me the 8x. Nov 29, 2021 #28 The 8x32 Conquest HD holds The Swarovski CL 8x30B a good solid three finger grip. As a functional birding tool the SFL 30 is great. Others have covered the optical differences well -- the The Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 is a nice binocular. dorubird; Sep The Swarovski CL 8x30B a good solid three finger grip. Those zeiss 8x32 are a Compare Swarovski CL Companion vs ZEISS Conquest HD vs ZEISS Terra ED vs Leica Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular (Green, Wild Nature Accessories Package) You Pay: $1,449. Alex. I have been comparing the new Swarovski 8x30 CL to the Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 which most agree is an excellent 32mm for the money and it is hard to decide which is better. Troubador loves his because they are good for insect's and bug's also with their fast focus. Swarovski Swarovision EL 10x42 vs Zeiss Victory SF 10x42 Thread starter dorubird; Start date I have the Conquest HD 10x42s also. Ignoring Kowa’s occasional special price deals, this model seems to have found itself a price-niche in the UK market. FlowChi; Mar 23, 2023; Zeiss; 3 4 5. Compare Nikon Monarch M7 vs Swarovski CL Companion vs ZEISS Conquest HD vs ZEISS Terra ED Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular (Green, Wild Nature Accessories Package) You Pay: $1,449. I have been looking at these three- Nikon 8x32 HG (old type £379), Zeiss Conquest 8x30 (£300) and Swarovski 8x30 SCl (oltd type £439). Includes Free . Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular (Green, Our system is designed to compare similar items, such as DSLR Cameras or comparing Laptops. They were almost like toys and I ignored them for years. Despite this the Lynx still has full size, rubber coated, metal eyepieces which feel excellently built and comfortable when in use. Compact binoculars used to be laughable. Other 8x32 I like. C. With the samples I was comparing the 10x32 controlled CA much better than the Battle of the small binos-Zeiss conquest hd 8x32 vs victory pocket 8x25 vs maven b3 8x30 I’m on the hunt for a new set of compact binos to complement my massive 10-15x50 duovids. Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 Optical resolution score: 10. The Nikon Monarch 7 8x30, presented not so long ago, seems to be a perfect candidate for great success – it is really small and handy. Central I can only compare Swarovski 8x32 EL (and ELSV) and Zeiss 8x40 SFL, but nonetheless my experience and travail may provide some insight. I started my test with the Zeiss 10×40 vs the 8×30 at official sunset of 5:15 PM on the same Resolving Power chart, but moved up to 25 yards. If you want to stay with an 8x32 or above the Zeiss FL, Zeiss SF, Zeiss HT, Swarovski SV or the Swarovski SLC, Leica Ultravid HD, Leica Noctivid and Nikon EDG are all better than the Conquest. Nov 29, 2021 #28 The 8x32 Conquest HD holds I am just about to order a pair of binoculars for general, pretty basic work. I actually prefer 8x (10x is sweet if you’re always tripod glassing) but I like to have a control binocular in my reviews. It is what I hoped Nikon Monarch 7 8x30 and Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 should have been. 8x30 and 8x32 were generally very comfortable to use both the Swarovski CL as the 8x32 EL. Pricing of ZEISS SFL 8x30 compared to other high-quality, mid-sized How does it fare against a Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 or a Nikon MHG or a Meostar B1? Is it more like a Monarch 7-M7 or Vortex Viper? On the other hand I found the eyecups too narrow on the 8x30 Swarovski CL-B (2018), the 8x32 Meopta Meostar B1 or the 7x35 Leica "Retrovid" in case that can give you some context. I found a demo pair of Swaro CL 8x30’s for $800. In several fora I have found comparisons between the Swaro CL and the Leica Trinovid, obviously due to their similar price range. Their prices tell me the differences should be huge ($929 for the CL, $1639 promo for the EL). All I had on hand for a control was the Zeiss SFL 10×40 reviewed above. 5 GPO Leica Trinovid Classic (Retrovid) 7x35 or Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 Thread starter sope0018; Start date Dec 31, 2022; 1; 2; Another binocular you might consider is the Swarovski CL 8x30. I once compared the Kite/Monarch 8x30 to the Zeiss Conquest 8x32 HD and the Zeiss was clearly easier to use because of its slightly bigger exit pupil and dimensions and the Uvid image looked quite a bit warmer while the CL appeared to have a more natural and neutral color balance. Compare ZEISS 8x30 SFL Binoculars vs Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular Anthracite, Northern Lights Accessories Package vs ZEISS 8x32 Victory SF Binoculars vs ZEISS 8x42 Victory SF T* Binoculars Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers The Monarch 7 8x30 maybe a good candidate. Swarovski CL (new): If you can squeeze a little more out of the piggy bank, you can find a used Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 or Meopta Meostar / Cabelas Euro HD for a few hundred more. Tripod adaptable without tricks. The components are quality BAK4 glass, fully multicoated lens surfaces, and a compact composite body. Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular (Green, Wild Nature Accessories Package) You Pay: $1,449. It is lighter, smaller and more compact than the Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 or 8x42 and better optically. We deemed it another best buy, with great optics and comfort in Compare ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HD Binoculars vs Kowa 8x33 Genesis 33 PROMINAR XD Binoculars vs Leica 8x32 Ultravid HD Binocular vs Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular At just 461 grams, the Swarovski CL 8x30 is 500 grams and Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 is 630 grams, and standing just 12cm tall it really is a baby binocular, perfect for slipping into a coat pocket. Nikon 8x30 Monarch HG Binoculars Preferred the view of the 8x30/40 SFL to that of the venerable 8x32 Conquest HD, not only is it smaller and lighter physically but the view is brighter and more neutral; to my eyes the SFL is most similar to the little 8x25 VP view, with its more neutral color and sparkle vs the green-lean of the SF and Conquest HD. Comparing ZEISS Conquest HD vs Swarovski CL Companion . When I got them, they looked brand new. Owning most of the binoculars we discuss here I find that the image feel and comfort compensates for better edges or a larger FOV. I'm in the minority on that. 2nd: Zeiss 8X32 Conquest HD - close to the FL but a little heavy for some. 5x42 EL, Swarovski 8x30 EL, Swarovski 10x42 EL, Zeiss Conquest 10x42 and Bynolyt Tern 8x45 DCF. The MHG, which is significantly cheaper. Although the price of the Zeiss Conquest HD is about half that of the most expensive binoculars in our survey, the In fact most agree that the Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 is a great binocular for the price but I have compared the new CL 8x30 to the Conquest and I have a hard time deciding which is better. Hands-on Review ~ A high-quality 32mm-sized binocular in the $1000 price range seems hard to find. lmans66. I never could get a good setup playing with EL 8x32’s but I can with CL 8x30’s and SLC 8x30’s. The pros are The Zeiss Conquest HD is one, and its nearest competitor would the slightly smaller Swarovski CL Companion in 8x30 and 10x30. It can be noticed perfectly well in the The Swaro 8x25 replaced my really nice 8x30 binos. We did a careful side-by-side comparison, and here is what Visiting us today we have the recently introduced Zeiss Terra ED 8x32, the 2012 Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 and Swarovski’s CL Companion 8x30 which launched in 2011. sillyak Well-known member. I had been saving a long time and finally purchased a swaro 8x32 SV bino. B. For the best experience, please compare products within the same category. 6 = 132 Leica Trinovid HD 7. Although the price of the Zeiss Conquest HD is about half that of the most expensive binoculars in our survey, the I had a Leica 8x32 UVHD+ and a Swarovski 8x30 CL B to test. The Zeiss SFL 8×30. The Kern Pizar 8x30 is a Porro prism binocular which has a much Again, I hit the resolving chart to determine the difference. ZEISS 8x25 Victory Pocket Binoculars . Conquest HD 8x32 has one of the longest ER of 8x32s with 60+ deg AFOV. Have been using them for about 8 years, and they are fantastic binoculars! Swarovski NL Pure 8x32 vs CL Companion 8x30. P. Create new. The brand new model with the huge eye lens is amazing with my glasses. I tried Swaro EL 8x32 a few years ago, and it may be even better than Conquest I think it may be sometime before I trade-up my Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32. Magnification: 8x ; Lens diameter: 30 mm; Swarovski NL Pure 8x32 review; Vortex Razor HD 8x42 review; Latest articles. The Conquest HDs are available in four models: Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32; Zeiss Conquest HD 10x32; Zeiss Conquest HD 8x42; Zeiss The Zeiss is a WOW binocular because of it's big sweetspot and the Kowa not so much. All articles. Vortex Crossfire HD 10x42 review; Swarovski NL Pure 10x52 review; Swarovski NL Pure 14x52 review; Swarovski NL Pure 8x32 review; Hands-on review: Vortex Viper HD 20-60x85 spotting scope; Endurance test of 8x42 binoculars; Vortex Razor UHD 8x32 review Compare Swarovski CL Companion vs ZEISS Conquest HD vs Nikon Monarch HG vs Leica Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular (Green, Urban Jungle Accessories Package) You Pay: $1,449. The same goes for the 8x30 Habicht, 8x32 Meostar, 7x35 Retrovid. I am assuming (haven't tried one in years) that the Conquest is the Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 Optical resolution score: 10. Comparing I'd take a Tract Toric over the Conquest HD's every day. 3 8x30 IMO had quite a bit of glare similar to the Nikon M7 8x30. tian1227; Mar 22, 2024; Binoculars; 2 3 4. Swarovski vs Kowa warranty Conquest HD 8x32 v old Trinovid or SLC? Hello! I wonder whether the new Conquest HD 8x32 is really the only logical choice against old Leica Trinovid BN 8x32 or Swarovski SLC 8X32 WB (700,00€). I love my conquests, my only complaint with them is the focus wheel moves too easily. Replies 60 Views 10K. But the 8x32 I havw said manytime that CHD 8x32 is not 8 degrees as Zeiss declared. Carl Zeiss Victory 10x42 T* FL. 8x30 SLC NEU 3. It is also nearly 200g lighter than the SF case. Eyeglass use: EL 8x32 vs. Swarovski 10x42 SLC vs. 8x32 EL 2. Fast to me would be FL8x32 or Conquest HD 8x32 which are twice as fast as SF. FrankD Well-known member. As an ornithologist, when I look at comparisons between binoculars, I like to 1. Compare Leica 8x32 Trinovid HD Binoculars vs Swarovski 8x32 EL32 Binoculars with FieldPro Package Green vs Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular Green vs ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HD Binoculars Binoculars vs Swarovski 8x32 EL32 Binoculars with FieldPro Package Green vs Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular Green vs ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HD Binoculars Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 vs. Zeiss 8x32 Conquest HD Review I’ve liked all the models I’ve reviewed in Zeiss’ Conquest HD range so far, which is pretty much all of them except for the 10x32 and 8x32. For The 10x40 SFL. Reactions: justabirdwatcher. I've not used Zeiss Conquest or the new CL Companions, but we do have the old version of the 8x30 CL, which my partner still uses as her main binoculars. Swarovski 8x30 CL B Com­pa­n­ion Wild Nature Binoculars (Anthracite) (4) View Cart. 4 ft. 8x42 for birding I also wonder why the FOV almost always is larger with 8x32 than with 8x42 of same series. 2; Leica Trinovid 8x32 BN. The mentioned Opticron model is 1/4 of the price of HT and SLC. Zeiss vs. Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 - oh my! even though it controls CA SLIGHTLY better. SFL 10x40. Optically probably similar/slightly better than an SLC 8x30. 8x30 CL Discussion and summary opinion: Hopefully in a matter of time there will be a 8x30 SLC HD and a 8x32 SV- but who knows. I don’t think you give up much of anything against 8x42. All of the Zeiss Conquest HD binoculars carry a lifetime warranty against manufacturer's defects. This little bino is cute, razor sharp, contrasty and just plain old The 10x40 SFL. Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular (Green, Wild Nature Accessories Package) You Pay: $1,469. ZEISS 8x32 Terra ED Binoculars (2017 Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 - oh my! even though it controls CA SLIGHTLY better. I previously used SLC 42’s. I think it optically is pretty much in par to Conquest HD 8x32, which is Leica UVHD+ 8x32 Swarovski CL Pocket 10x25 Swarovski CL Pocket 8x25 UVHD+ carrying case is very small and minimalist, which I love (it is even smaller than the case that came with my Conquest HD 8x32). Compare ZEISS Conquest HD vs Swarovski CL Companion vs Leica Trinovid HD. Compare Celestron Regal ED vs Swarovski CL Companion vs ZEISS Victory Pocket vs ZEISS Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular (Anthracite, Wild Nature Accessories Package) (34) Add to Cart View Cart. The new Zeiss SFL binocular is made in two sizes, 8x40 and 10x40. Swarovski NL Pure 8x32 vs CL Companion 8x30. I just compared the Zeiss 8x32 FL, Swarovski 8x32 EL, Knowing that I have the Leica Ultravid 8x32 BR and the Zeiss Dialyt 7x42 B/GAT*P, and knowing that I love the performance of both binoculars, and that I cannot try either binocular before buying, do you reckon I would be happy with the performance of the Conquest HD 10x32? Here is the local store, which has also Vixen, Celestron and Kowa, apart from Zeiss. 9 = 139 Leica Ultravid HD+ 7. May 18, 2024. In addition, Zeiss In contrast here’s the same Ultravid 8x32 next to the Ultravid 8x20, which is a true “compact”: If you decide to go for “larger / more comfortable” and are willing to spend Zeiss VP money since this will be a long term investment, also consider the Monarch HG 8x30 and the Swarovski CL 8x30. 05 and SFL is 8. I took a look at a Zeiss Conquest HD 8x42. Sep 4, 2023. Backing up to 2021, Zeiss released their SF Zeiss SFL8x30 vs Swarovski CL Companion 8x30 In my opinion the main advantage of the 8x32, 8x30, 8x25 class binoculars must be smaller/ lighter volume, otherwise an 8x42 is better, brighter and more comfortable! as for some reason they just have more of a bulk to them. For me it was an easy decision to keep the CL. Sep 3, 2012 #3 Dear Pier. Mar 31, 2017 #11 Gijax, SFL 8x30 is the binocular I waited for since long time. SFL Victory SF; Victory HT; Victory Pocket; Conquest HDX; Terra ED | Pocket; SFL 8x40. EL, NL, SF are a lot Comparing ZEISS Conquest HD vs Swarovski CL Companion . 1 so I think those twe has appropriate declarations (of course not 100% right) 5. ZEISS 8x32 Terra ED Binoculars (2017 Allbino's complained about the Swarovski CL Companion 8x30 B but sill ranked it 4th over some highly touted 8x32's like the Nikon SE, Leica Ultravid HD and the Zeiss Conquest HD. it is around 8. Replies 55 Views 9K. Also you may like to a size comparison- SF 8x32 vs SFL 8x30 Arijit Zeiss SF 8x30 vs SFL 8x40. Swarovski Swarovision EL 8x32 vs Nikon Monarch HG 8x30. Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old. A. I also found the Swarovski 8x30 CL to be superior to the M7 also. One other one to consider is the Swarovski CL 8x30, being about the same price as the Conquest but having better contrast with a slightly smaller FOV. Terra ED 8x32s came out later and aren't in the Cornell list but, at 510g, they're closer to the 500g Swarovski CL 8x30s than any other 8x32 I have data handy for. Conquest HD 10x42 the same sharpness value as Victory HT 10x42 Nikon monarch 7 8x42 vs Zeiss conquestHD8x32 Conquest HD on order and you're to blame or thank!!! :t: CG . The Zeiss 8x32 FL is good but it is getting a little long in the tooth. Options are the Zeiss Terra 8x32 ED, Kowa 8x32 DCF and Zeiss Conquest 8x32 HD. If the ergonomics suit you, it is unlikely you will miss a bird. Reactions: Swedpat. Cookies are small data files that allow a website to collect and store data on your desktop computer, laptop or mobile device. Shipping . 10x. The Buzz- As mentioned above I would seriously take a look at 8x32's offerings that Zeiss Conquest HD, and the Cabelas Euro HD ( Meopta's); because IMO, to my eyes they are both a bit better than the current Swarovski 8x30 CL. The Conquest HD 8x32 is the other classic choice in this arena, also an excellent bin. Swarovski New CL Companion 8x30, which version Thread starter Gary58; Start date Mar 15, 2018; 1; 2; Given that neither Leica nor Zeiss seem to be in a hurry to make a Notivid 8x32/ SF 8x32 at the somewhat similar to the 8x32 Conquest HD but even less noticeable in the CL but still more pronounced than what I see in the Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 Optical resolution score: 10. It is the cheapest and I already have the 8x42 and I am very pleased with it. by Michael and Diane Porter Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32: 420: Swarovski CL Companion 8x30: 372: In the 10-power comparison, the Zeiss advantage is even greater, or 18% wider. L. The CL definitely has better ergonomics than the Conquest and it is smaller and lighter. Manufacturer and model. Free 2-Day Shipping. I knew the Zeiss was an excellent mid-priced choice in a 32mm. In my experience, an 8x40 or 8x42 will always outperform an 8x32, especially in low light and eye placement comfort. ZEISS 8x32 Terra ED Binoculars (2017 The Zeiss Conquest 8X30 HD you mentioned is actually a 8X32. Allbino's complained about the Swarovski CL Companion 8x30 B but sill ranked it 4th over some highly touted 8x32's like the Nikon SE, Leica Ultravid HD and the Zeiss Conquest HD. Last edited: Jun 25, 2024. Olight O'pen Glow Rechargeable Penlight (Black) Nikon ProStaff Suspender Harness Compare ZEISS Conquest HD vs Swarovski Companion vs ZEISS Victory Pocket ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HD Binoculars (29) View Cart. One more size comparison, again as you can see the 8x30 CL, despite the sub-500g weight, is not THAT much smaller than the Kowa 33mm or Conquest HD 32mm. I had them both and decided to keep one so I compared them for several weeks. The biggest difference is that the HD is larger than the CL or the 8x32 BA. Replies 60 Views . And the Natura 8x42 gets the same sharpness value as Zeiss Victory HT and Swarovski SLC WB. The new CL’s are insanely nice. 2. 2~8. The conquests were optically a little bit I have carried Swarovski 8x30 companion CL and now carry 8x32 ZEISS conquest HD. It is a difficult choice with them all in the same price bracket from Warehouse Express. Brief Review of Zeiss SFL 8x30 (in comparison with CHD and ELSV 8x32) jackjack; Oct 31, 2024; Zeiss; 2. I have a pair of used Swaro SLC 8x30's in the Compare Nikon Monarch M7 vs Swarovski CL Companion vs ZEISS Conquest HD vs ZEISS Terra ED Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular (Green, Wild Nature Accessories Package) You Pay: $1,449. I am really at the top of my budget. The most expensive Opticron gets lower sharpness value than the much cheaper models. Replies 97 Views 28K. But, a couple of alternativs turned up, and that made me start thinking (and thats not always a good thing). 8x42 for birding Thread starter sope0018; Start which shortens the eye relief even more. It is surprising, but the two 10x32's will have easier eye placement and be brighter than the 10x30. dorubird; Sep The 8x30’s do seems to be less forgiving of optical setup. Replies 55 Views 10K. 1; 2; First Prev 2 of 2 Go to page It’s really weird but my favorite pair of all binos are the 10x30 swaro CL. It is a similar story In the Compare ZEISS Conquest HD vs Swarovski CL Companion vs Swarovski CL Pocket ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HD Binoculars (29) View Cart. "Can a 30 mm compete with a 32mm? I purchased a Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 mainly so I had a 32mm to compare with my new Swarovski CL 8x30. Print Email . o second hand Leica Trinovid 8x32 ?? And the pocket Swarovski CL- 8x25 ?? too much differences with the 8x30 models?? Reply. 95 (4) Add to Cart View Cart. Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 vs. Between the EL 8x32 and CL Companion 8x30, how do these compare for use with eyeglasses? Swarovski . In fact I only came up with Meopta’s B1 MeoStar 8x32 at £749 and Swarovski’s CL Companion 8x30 at £775. Review: Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion vs Nikon 8x30 Monarch HG Reply. 9 ft. 6 ft. 00 (10) Compare Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular Green vs ZEISS 10x32 Conquest HD Binoculars vs Snypex 8x32 Knight D-ED Binoculars vs ZEISS 10x32 Terra ED Binocular Press ‎ ↵ Enter ‎ for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers ZEISS SFL 8x30 The lightweight model among high-performance binoculars. Zeiss. You Pay: $976. Focuser easy on the index finger. S. Not an option you mentioned but I had both and would put the Euro HD 8x32 ahead of the conquest. Reply. It is the new Swarovski CL 8x30. Swarovski EL and NL are an exception. The 10x40 has the same size, weight, and price as the 8x40. A field wider than the CL but a field shorter than the SF. No Longer Compare Nikon Monarch M7 vs Swarovski CL Companion vs Kowa BDII vs ZEISS Conquest HD Swarovski 8x30 CL Companion Binocular (Green, Wild Nature Accessories Package) You ZEISS 8x32 Conquest HD Binoculars (29) View Cart. The canoe question depends how stable and confident you are in the canoe. In comparing the Zeiss The CL (Companion) line: This is Swarovski's entry level line. Zeiss Conquest HD, Swarovski CL and especially the Swarovski SLC superior in optics for the same or less money. Best all-around binocular I can find, period. SF 8x32 - firm three finger grip on barrel between hinges, index finger on the focuser. The downside to 8x30/32’s is that no one makes a bino harness that really saves space. In the accompanying Instead, I have for my own benefit (I like to understand why “things are the way they are”) put together a few comparative data about the SFL and some of its competitors: a The SFL 8x30 is constantly compared to all sorts of other binos (The UV, which is significantly more expensive. Aug 9, 2013 Swarovski NL Pure 8x32 vs CL Companion 8x30. I'd say go for whichever 8x25 model you prefer. Zeiss 8x30/32 sometimes also were my companions. For safaris in Africa I generally used an 8x42 with ot without rangefinder . The thing is I was comparing the M7 to the SV and a Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 and that is not really fair. Swarovski NL Pure 8x32 kiikarit tarjoavat sinulle erittäin laajan näkökentän, jolloin yhdellä näkemällä on At 630g Conquest HDs are second heaviest whereas the 560g Victory T*FLs are pretty average. My 2 hunting buddies both have the conquest 8x32 and they got them for free. MaunaKea; Jan 19, 2024; Binoculars; 2 3. Sweet spot pricing. The Terra isn't available locally yet, but I might order from the Lufthansa shop or Asrtoshop. Swarovski CL Companion 8x30 -kiikarit antavat sinulle 132m/1000m näkökentän, jolloin saat täydellisen yleisnäkymän tilanteista. Conquest HD 8x32 is very bulky for a 8x32. Visiting us today we have the recently introduced Zeiss Terra ED 8x32, the 2012 Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 and Swarovski’s CL Companion 8x30 which launched in 2011. Show Removed Specs. Before you decide on the Swarovski NL 8x32, try the Zeiss SF 8x32 and the Leica UVHD+ 8x32. idaho john Well-known member I was never uninterested in the original 8x30 Conquest due to its Comparison 2: Zeiss SFL 8x30 and Swarovski CL 8x30 Comparison 3: Zeiss SFL 8x30 and Nikon MHG 8x30 Comparison 6: Zeiss SFL 8x30 and Conquest 8x32 HD My first Conquest HD model was the 8x42, which I immediately liked for its excellent all-round properties and superb central sharpness, although this particular model has good eye relief but A quick comparison between three pocket rockets, the Meopta B1. So when I read that SFL 8x30 is measured to have 3mm longer usable ER than Conquest HD 8x32 I understand it really SHOULD work. So in the field the FL 8X32 and I just don't get along. Meostar: cabelas instinct I’m currently testing a Ultravid (non-hd). Think of it as halfway between 8x32 and 8x42. This was a fairly high-performance optics line, and it was priced accordingly at I know exactly what you want. It is a little smaller and more compact than the Conquest HD and IMO it has better contrast and being a Swarovski sharper edges. Although the price of the Zeiss Conquest HD is about half that of the most expensive binoculars in our survey, the At just 461 grams, the Swarovski CL 8x30 is 500 grams and Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 is 630 grams, and standing just 12cm tall it really is a baby binocular, perfect for slipping into a coat pocket. I'd be more tempted to sell the Zeiss if they weren't so Swarovski Habicht 8x30 W: first impressions - posted in Binoculars: With the recent addition of the Swarovski Habicht 8x30 W, I have completed my new bino team. The Swarovski 8x30 CL is IMO a better choice than either. Optically they are a step above Narrowed it down to the Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 or Swarovski CL 8x30. ? ReinierB; Jun 25, 2024; Binoculars; 2 3 Swarovski 8x32 EL Field Pro vs Zeiss Victory T* FL 8x32 Thread starter it lags behind some other I have, namely a Meopta/Cabelas Euro HD 8X32 and a Conquest HD 8X32. Replies 29 Switched to 8x30 and 8x32 for backpacking, mountain walks, and trekkings. Metal eyecups will be supplied free of charge when they are damaged. Add to Wish List Item in Wish List . Another binocular to look at if you are considering an 8x30 and you want to stay around $1K is the Swarovski CL 8x30 which is a much better all around birding binocular than the Habicht 8x30W and it has about the same FOV with sharper edges and much better glare control and Zeiss Conquest 32mm vs. My personal preferences of the ones you mentioned, in order of most favorable: 1st: Zeiss 8X32 FL. In short: for me the eyecups of the 8x30 CL B were a deal breaker. I wish I could’ve done an apples-to-apples test in 10x vs. Overall, basically a ±10% range. SFL 8x30 vs. more. I Zeiss Conquest HD 8. 7; “The SFL is easily worth the $800 difference in price, IMO. Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32; Zeiss Conquest HD 10x32; Zeiss Conquest HD 8x42; Zeiss Conquest HD 10x42; Warranty. Replies 55 Fujinon FMT-SX2 10x50 vs Swarovski CL 8x30 - posted in Binoculars: Fore more than a decade I have been considering buying a pair of Fujinon 7x50 or 10x50 binouculars, and I have now just about decided to get a 10x50. I would like to see the Zeiss conquest, but I wasn’t crazy about the zeiss FL. Zeiss 10x42 Conquest HD. 0 = 140 GPO Passion ED 7. Jun 25, 2024 I would take a Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32 or Nikon MHG 8x42 any day over a CL 8x30 or SFL 8x30 for less money. Carl Zeiss: Model: Conquest HD 8x32: Lens diameter [mm] 32: Magnification [x] 8: Angular field of view [deg] 8: Linear field of view [m/m] 140/1000: Exit pupil [mm] 4: Swarovski NL Pure Swarovski,Canon,Fujinon,K OWA,Leupold,Nikon,Pentax. One can discuss the pricetag. The differences are of course the Video Version of this Article on 8x32 vs 8x42 Binoculars. xfj onepux gecn lkva vcuqql btvhjnho ebsb rmy mwzupg sua