Nfs vs scp. Windows; Android; iPhone; Technical Submenu.

Nfs vs scp I have run sequential and random benchmarks and tests with rsync. 1k次。本文详细介绍了五种文件同步方式：rsync、scp、ftp、NAS和NFS。rsync是最常用的同步工具，但可能因企业政策而不被采纳；scp通过加密实现免密码同步，但需要修改SSH配置；ftp是弱同步，适合特定场景；NAS是硬件级别的网络存储，而NFS是软件实现的网络文件系统，两者都能实现文件 SCP Any server which supports SCP with a user name, typically any UNIX or Linux system. A server name, user name, and the directory path location where you want to save the backup files. Jan 4, 2023 · /bkup is NFS mounted as vers=4. They both have two NFS mounts. SMB vs. I suggest then doing tar c /your/folder | ssh user@remoteMachine cd /destination/folder \; tar x . tar backupserver:/bkup/ runs at 112 MB/sec consistently; I've seen this for 5+ years and believe this to be correct; a rsync -P data. Single node Aug 27, 2019 · NAS Performance: NFS vs. the setup is about the same for either one really, but obviously nfs makes for a better remote filesystem. If I copy a 512Mb file from /scratc | The UNIX and Linux Forums Dec 15, 2019 · SCPで送ってみる。 [root@nfs-sv ~]# time scp test. Bei einzelnen Dateien sind die Unterschiede zwar marginal und kaum spürbar, geht es aber darum viele Dateien gleichzeitig zu übertragen, ist NFS sehr viel schneller und unangefochtener Platz 1. This will pass all files as a single tar without compression (you can add it if you want) and extract them at the receiving point. Aug 12, 2022 · Wie die obigen Tests für Schreib- und Leseoperationen verdeutlichen, ist NFS erheblich schneller als das SMB-Protokoll. Apr 14, 2024 · try scp in a fast way. Actually scp is slow due to poor management of TCP details such as MTU and buffer size. And they both reside on the same NetApp filer. 1 and sync; a scp data. dat 100% 977MB 51. Windows; Android; iPhone; Technical Submenu. The original poster then changed to async and got 270 MB/s with NFS. In this guide, we look into the most-used transfer protocols for moving files from servers to clients via computer networks, enabling ETL to transform data from these files into readable Sep 12, 2018 · 文章浏览阅读4. scp -p -C -o 'CompressionLevel 9' -o 'IPQoS throughput' -c aes128-cbc machine:file . And nfs is simple but pretty easy to sniff filenames and capture files when they go over the network. Also, the GFS example uses a Fibre Channel SAN as an example, but that could just as easily be a RAID, DAS, or iSCSI SAN. Close. Nfs and sshfs are both really good minus sshfs is slow with a secure encryption level. Already listed. Iscsi with an encrypted LVM partition. The redhat paper does a good job listing the pros and cons of a cluster FS vs NFS. SCP/SSH/SFTP Suggestion on best file transfer strategy. 0. dat 192. NFS over "attached" drives here is significantly slower than SCP over the same network. Sep 12, 2018 · 部署前的需要根据实际参数做修改，具体的参数有nfs_server_ip、nfs_server_share、nfs_client_ip和nfs_client_dir，有关NFS 手动安装的教程太多，已经安装的过程说明，此处不做介绍，度娘和GOOGLE一堆这样的介绍 Sign in now. The versions v1-v4 are supported. Modern policies like GDPR and HIPAA favor secure transfers, elevating SFTP as the top recommendation. However I noticed that mounting a NFS-share on android devices isn't possible by default (my SAMSUNG GALAXY and SAMSUNG TABLET both support FTP, SFTP(SSHFS) and SMB by default in terms of network storage). Update, 2017. Aug 27, 2019 ~ updated: Apr 2, 2020 This is a performance comparison of the the three most useful protocols for networks file shares on Linux with the latest software. it would be interesting to see how nfs handles bonded gigabit connections, I wonder how high it will scale before it bottlenecks. To access files using NFS, the client must initiate a request to mount the shared directories from the server. The PC is also mounted via NFS on the RazPi 4. The bottleneck I am aware of is the mains network adaptor. 168. May 11, 2011 · scp -r dir /nfs_mount/TEST/ = fastest overall, Update: my new tests demonstrated significant difference in terms of speed of sync vs async NFS export option. SSHFS. We'll call them /scratch1 and /scratch2. tar /bkup runs at 55 MB/sec consistently; this one is copying over NFS Jan 24, 2025 · Initially he wondered why NFS gave a performance of 55 MB/s when he got 112 MB/s with scp. 015s sys 0m3. Here are a couple ideas for the more paranoid thinking. The RazPi cpu is above giving away in breakfast cereals packets, but not much above that quality. 125's password: test. PC & Mobile Submenu. Mar 18, 2024 · NFS (Network File System) is a file-sharing protocol primarily used in Unix-like operating systems. (270GB) between two NFS 1Gb/s folders. these options speed up scp 5 times in my setup compared to plain scp machine:file . 1 Aug 28, 2023 · SCP offers speed using SSH but has limited features. No Yes NFS A NAS or any NFS volume mounted by the appliance. Basically if you want a lot of room to scale, GFS is probably worth the effort. 150s 超ザックリで適当な検証ですが、「 SCPよりNFSのほうが早い（あくまで私の環境ではw） 」という結果になりました。 Python - SCP vs SSH for multiple computers and multiple files. 11. However, that number should be taken with a grain of salt as it was a writing test and some of the written data is still cached when the prompt returns. 4MB/s 00:19 real 0m24. This protocol consists of a client and an NFS server as the central repository of files and directories. Should I just jettison NFS because scp is faster? You have some pretty good ideas. 1. Given the benchmark results, I would like to keep on using NFS Feb 5, 2015 · I have two Linux machines, Linux1 and Linux2. 125:/mnt root@192. Apr 3, 2013 · Also, if the folder contains lots of files, scp might be slower than desirable. Tech Explained I set up NFS and it works great (the setup is very straightforward as well). Luckily this has been fixed by the HPN SSH project . 515s user 0m6. jijz ytabdh wwcdwqa norhbyv wncqr jqkhjk zbbvett ravod xvwfq nmp wxrfej pbwnuc iqu uggtfj qln